Search This Blog

Thursday, December 13, 2012

Acer C7 Chromebook review


You might have thought it impossible to make a cheaper Chromebook than the Samsung Chromebook Series 3, but you’d be wrong. With the new C7 Chromebook, Acer has constructed a slim-and-light laptop running Chrome OS that can be sold for a ludicrously low £199.
What’s more, it’s constructed one that in some ways outmatches the Samsung. It has a clearer, brighter and higher-contrast 11.6in screen, a more notebook-like 1.1GHz Intel Celeron 847 processor instead of the Samsung’s ARM-based Exynos 5 CPU, and more onboard storage. It even has, on the whole, better connectivity. Why then, would we prefer the Samsung of the two?

Physical design

Partly, it comes down to look and feel. With its Chromebook, Samsung came up with what was effectively a bargain-basement Ultrabook; lightweight and a little cheap and plasticky, but reasonably robust and very practical. The Acer has a smaller desktop footprint at 285 x 202mm against the Samsung’s 290 x 204mm, but it’s thicker at 25mm to the Samsung’s slimline 17.5mm, and also heavier at 1.4kg to the Samsung’s 1.1kg. The result is a machine that feels closer to a netbook than an Ultrabook, albeit a larger than average one with a screen and keyboard to match. It also feels creakier in places than the Samsung, with more bounce under the keyboard and more flex in the chassis underneath. With its two-tone black and grey-metallic casing the C7 looks smart, but like the Samsung, it feels cheaper than it looks. I’d still happily throw one in a backpack, but I’d be happier carrying the Samsung day-to-day.
There’s also the lesser question of noise. One of the good things about the new Samsung Chromebook is that, thanks to the kind of ARM-based processor normally found in tablets and smartphones it runs completely silent. With its more conventional Intel processor, the C7 doesn’t, and you’ll hear the fans kicking in quite a bit as soon as the CPU has a little work to do. It’s a surprisingly irritating buzz, and not helped by the fact that while the Samsung uses solid-state storage, the C7 uses a standard laptop hard disk. As a result, you’ll hear that clicking away from time to time.

Connectivity

Connectivity is one area where the C7 improves on the Samsung Chromebook Series 3. It might not have the Samsung’s USB 3.0 port, but makes up for it with three USB 2.0 ports to the Samsung’s one, plus HDMI, VGA and headphone outputs.
There’s also an SD memory card slot at the front and an Ethernet port on the left-hand side; one thing which the WiFi-only Samsung couldn’t boast. USB 3.0 is still most useful for connecting external storage, so on a device designed to work with cloud-based services its omission isn’t a fatal flaw. Overall, the C7 provides a better balance of ports and sockets.

Ergonomics

Unfortunately, the C7’s smaller desktop footprint comes at a cost. Where the Samsung Chromebook has a relatively luxurious keyboard with generously sized keys, not to mention a surprisingly big touchpad, the Acer has to manage with only slightly smaller keys, but a more cramped layout. The Chrome OS-specific function keys in the top row are tiny, while the cursor keys are ridiculously minute. The hash key is actually jammed against the return key, and ditto for the backslash key and the left-shift.
However, It’s not all bad news. The trackpad might be smaller, but it feels marginally more responsive than the one on the Samsung, particularly when it comes to two-finger gestures for scrolling or right-clicking. Meanwhile what’s become a Power button on Samsung’s Chromebooks, here returns to its original role: Delete. While I prefer the crisper typing action on the Samsung, I wouldn’t call the C7’s keyboard a disaster by any means. In fact, I’m using it to write this review right now, and barely missing a keystroke.

Screen and sound

The screen on the C7 is better than the screen on the Samsung Chromebook. It’s brighter, there’s more contrast, and whites look genuinely white and not slightly yellow. While it’s a TN screen with all the narrow viewing angles that implies, it still beats most netbook screens and even many budget laptops stone dead. The 11.6in size and 1,366 x 768 resolution match the Samsung, and the only advantage the latter is left with is that the matt surface will fare better in more lighting conditions than the Acer’s glossy coating.
When you’re looking at photos or watching video, the C7 delivers stronger pictures and better colours every time. When it comes to sound, the C7 is a little less impressive. It’s hard to get a beefy output out of a laptop this size, and even harder when you’re doing so on such a tight budget. The Acer’s audio is weak, tinny and lacking bass and clarity. If you want to stream music or watch a film you’d better plug some headphones in.

Software

Having only just covered Chrome OS in the Samsung review, we won’t go overboard on it here. The important thing is that Google’s cloud-based OS is now ready for primetime. It has apps to cover most needs and scenarios, it supports a more conventional Windows-like UI with multiple windows, and the old complaint that a Chromebook is useless without an Internet connection no longer holds water. You can work on documents, spreadsheets and presentations offline and sync changes when you next connect, and you can also read and answer emails. The built-in file handlers for video, photos and PDFs offer more features and are easier to use, and file management as a whole is no longer a disaster.
I still wouldn’t want to use a Chromebook to do heavy-duty photo or video-editing, or even use one as my main PC, but as a cheap, highly mobile, secondary computer it’s perfectly adequate for everyday use. There’s zero maintenance, and it doesn’t waste your time. What’s more, the way Chrome OS works, with everything tied into your Google account and your desktop and app selection changing to match, makes a Chromebook perfect for sharing with a family, an office or a class. There’s not much of a learning curve when it comes to using it, and the more I use Chrome OS, the more I like it. Understand the limitations of working across an Internet connection - particularly in low-bandwidth situations - and you’ll probably feel the same.

Performance

There’s good news and semi-bad news when it comes to performance. Acer’s decision to go with a 320GB conventional hard disk instead of an SSD probably makes sense from an economic standpoint - the C7 is clearly a re-purposed Windows laptop - but it means this Chromebook starts up slightly slower than the Samsung, taking roughly 19 seconds. This isn’t a massive issue, and the C7 doesn’t feel at all sluggish in everyday use, but it is peculiar. After all, it’s not like the cloud-centric Chrome OS is really built to capitalise on a larger drive.
On the good news front, the Celeron-powered C7 performs slightly better on intensive tasks than the ARM-powered Samsung. Where HD video streams stuttered every few seconds on the Samsung, they run reasonably smoothly on the Acer, and games like Bastion are just about playable. The C7’s SunSpider benchmark score is faster than the Samsung’s, at 523.1 to 758.2, and the WebGL Aquarium demo runs at a smooth 60fps to the Samsung’s 36 to 45fps. If you want to play 3D games then you’re barking up the wrong tree with a Chromebook, but you might want to watch films, and in this respect the Acer has the Samsung beat - though we hope to see software updates improve the performance from the Samsung’s perfectly capable Exynos SoC.

Battery life

Sadly, we’re back in netbook territory when it comes to battery life. Acer and Google claim up to four hours, but that really is best-case scenario. While working with the Chromebook we’ve seen around three and a half hours of mixed use with screen brightness at acceptable, near-maximum levels, and a lot of video will drag that down to the three hour mark. This isn’t a problem if your Chromebook will stay rooted to a table or a desk, but a device like this is built for action anytime, anywhere both in and out of the house. The Samsung Series 5, with a life of around six and a half hours, could handle that role with ease, but here the battery life of the C7 is a real limitation.

Verdict

In a whole lot of ways, the Acer C7 Chromebook is a good ultra low-budget laptop. It has a surprisingly decent screen, a usable keyboard and trackpad and enough performance to run a wide range of applications. It’s streets ahead of any netbook you could purchase at this price (and might make the basis of an interesting Linux laptop). As a Chromebook, however, it’s just not as compelling a prospect as the Samsung Chromebook Series 3. Though it has the edge on screen quality, performance and connectivity, it’s heavier, noisier and not as strong in the keyboard department as the Samsung Chromebook Series 3, while the woeful battery life is a serious flaw. Converting an existing Windows laptop to Chrome OS might keep costs down, but the hard disk affects boot times and battery life while offering no real advantages to compensate. This is Acer’s most tempting Chromebook yet, but if you want Chrome OS then the Samsung is still the one to buy.

Specifications

Manufacturer and Product
Acer C7 Chromebook
Processor
1.1GHz Intel Celeron 847
RAM
2GB
Hard Disk
320GB 5400rpm HDD
Memory Expansion
SD Memory Card
Display
11.6in 1,366 x 768 TFT
Connectors
3x USB 2.0, HDMI, VGA, Gigabit Ethernet, headphone
Front-facing camera
720p
Wi-Fi
802.11b/g/n
Battery
2,500mAh
Size and weight
285 x 202 x 25mm, 1.4kg

Nexus 10 Review


DNP Nexus 10 review

When Google unleashed the Nexus 7 upon us earlier this summer we were caught completely off-guard. A $200 tablet that was legitimately good in every regard? It was unheard of at the time, and even five months later it's still a really nice slate. Now it has a big brother, the Nexus 10, this time coming courtesy of Samsung. At $399 it arrives with less fanfare and a higher price, but it also comes with a very distinctive selling point: a stratospherically high resolution.
This 10.1-inch panel has an eye-watering 2,560 x 1,600 resolution -- the very same as the 13-inch MacBook Pro with Retina display but in a much smaller package. Is Google's second reference tablet the ultimate Android 10-incher at a bargain price, or is it simply another big tablet with a lot of pixels? Your answer awaits after the break.

Nexus 10 review

Hardware


The Nexus 7, with its rubberized back and chunky profile, always felt very good for a budget tablet -- but mostly it just felt very good. The Nexus 10 feels like a completely different beast, which isn't entirely surprising since it's from a different manufacturer. ASUS got the nod to build the first reference tablet from Google, a development process that required a very close partnership with the manufacturer. Now it's Samsung's turn, continuing the tradition of Google spreading the Nexus love around.
The Nexus 7 felt very good for a budget tablet -- but mostly it just felt very good. The Nexus 10 feels like a completely different beast, which isn't entirely surprising since it's from a different manufacturer.
It's a fair partnership, since Samsung has long been the biggest supporter of Android on the tablet front, and of course since Google has long had an affinity for the Galaxy Tab 10.1 -- giving away 5,000 of the things at Google I/O a few years back. We've been wondering when Samsung would release a new stylus-free 10-incher, staying mostly quiet since the underwhelming Galaxy Tab 2 10.1. We're happy to say this one fares better. Mostly better.
It starts with a design that definitely looks like an evolution of the Gal Tab 2 10.1, itself very similar to the controversial Galaxy Tab 10.1N, whose most notable feature was a pair of front-facing speakers. That bit of design language carries on here, grilles embedded into the left and right bezel and extended farther down than before, running through nearly the entire vertical extent of the tablet.

DNP Nexus 10 review

Those speakers are hard to distinguish, though, in what is a sea of very dark materials all blending together into an interestingly rounded shape. Yes, this is still largely a rectangular piece of glass with a mind-boggling number of transistors stuffed in behind it, but the corners have big, lazily rounded profiles. Even the sides are subtly curved, bowing outward to eliminate any straight lines. This makes for a tablet that is incredibly comfortable to hold in any angle or orientation, but it also makes for a tablet that looks even bigger than it is.

It's slightly larger than Galaxy Tab 2 10.1, measuring 10.39 x 6.99 inches across (263.9 x 177.6mm) compared to that tablet's 10.11 x 6.9. But, it's well thinner, just 0.35 inches (8.9mm) vs. 0.38 (9.7mm) for its predecessor. That does make it thicker than the ASUS Transformer Pad Infinity TF700 (which is 0.33 inches thick). Meanwhile, for those keeping score across ecosystems, that makes for a tablet that's slightly taller (0.8 inches), narrower (0.4 inches) and thinner (0.6mm) than the latest generation iPad. It's lighter, too, at just 1.33 pounds (603 grams) compared to 1.44 (632 grams).
That relative lightness is likely due to the difference in materials, a plastic back dominating the flip-side of this device. It's covered with a soft-touch coating that feels unusually tacky, almost to the point of being sticky. It's nowhere near as nice feeling as the spun aluminum on the TF700 and a definite, and unfortunate, change from the dimpled cover on the back of the Nexus 7 that both looks and feels good. Mind you, a trace of that lineage remains here, a rubberized strip across the top of the back that has the same sort of perforated leather pattern -- just with a slightly tighter dispersal.
We wish Google would start mandating such covers to hide garish carrier branding on Android handsets.
That strip is punctuated by the 5-megapixel camera (capable of 1080p recording), which is inset next to its friend the LED flash. If you'd like to see more of these two you can actually remove that plastic strip altogether, which also reveals the tablet's FCC designation and all sorts of other internationally mandated brandings that are, printed here, cunningly and tidily hidden away, leaving the back nearly blemish-free. We wish Google would start mandating such covers to hide garish carrier branding on Android handsets.

DNP Nexus 10 review

On the top edge of the slate you'll find the only two physical controls, a volume rocker and a power/lock button. Travel around the corner to the left and you'll find a micro-USB port and 3.5mm headphone jack. On the bottom there's a six-pot pogo pin connector and, on the right, a very welcomed micro-HDMI port for streaming all your legitimately acquired video content to a bigger display. There is, contrary to our expectations, no way to wirelessly stream that video from this tablet, but more on that later in the review.
On the face of the device, again it's those big, beautiful stereo speakers. Inside the upper bezel of the display is a 1.9-megapixel camera (capable of 720p video recording) and, in the bottom bezel, an RGB notification LED. Your proclivity toward such blinkenlights probably directly correlates to the volume of email you receive, but still we're glad to see one here.
And then, of course, there are the juicy bits on the inside. Powering this slate is a 1.7GHz chip of the A15 Eagle variety. That processor architecture is capable of quad-core duties but this particular processor sits in a dual-core configuration. Sitting next to that is a Mali T604 GPU and 2GB of RAM matched with either 16 or 32GB of storage, depending on whether you paid $399 or $499. Neither is expandable.
Go crazy and Beam yourself in either direction. This tablet won't miss a beat.
There are no cellular models just yet, so WiFi will be your only link to the world. As such this slate is reasonably equipped with dual-band and MIMO and HT40 support over b/g/n. (Sorry, 802.11a hold-outs.) You also have GPS, Bluetooth 4.0 and NFC on both the front and the rear. So c'mon, go crazy and Beam yourself in either direction. This tablet won't miss a beat.

Display and sound

We'll type it again just because it's kind of neat: 2,560 x 1,600. That's an awful, awful lot of pixels in just a 10.1-inch PLS LCD panel -- way more than a 1080p HDTV contains. That it's in something that comfortably can be carried around, and that can be acquired for under $400, is quite a marvelous feat. It's good to live in the future.
And, indeed, things look fantastically sharp here. Text is rendered incredibly crisply and the UI looks better than ever. The first-party icons are all crisp and clean, though many third-party app icons do look like they could use a new, higher-resolution rendering. Thankfully, the apps themselves overwhelmingly look fine.
We tried dozens of apps, including third-party browsers like Dolphin, and we didn't spot a hint of blurry text.
Remember when the new iPad shipped and everyone was scrambling to update their apps to support it? There's no need here. The way Android is structured, apps just natively support the higher resolution. We tried dozens of apps, including third-party browsers like Dolphin and lots of different random utilities and games, and we didn't spot a hint of blurry text.
Of course, some feature graphics and assets that could use a higher degree of polish now that they're being consumed at such a preposterous resolution, and those with less than 20/20 vision may be squinting at some occasionally tiny text, but on average it's a big step above the blurry messes that many tablet apps were on the Retina iPad when it first launched. (A state that, we're happy to say, has long since passed thanks to the quick work of all those devs.)
The brightness of the display is fair, though not quite as searingly bright as the 600 nits the Infinity can pump out. Colors are well-rendered and viewing angles are very good, but we were a bit disappointed by the contrast. Blacks were a bit on the murky side, sometimes appearing more purplish, and we couldn't help but notice some distracting light leakage around the lower corners of the display, something we verified on a second Nexus 10.
And we'd also like to point out that this display is protected beneath a sheet of Corning's Gorilla Glass 2. This is a nice change over the Nexus 7, which sheathed in some other type of cover that we've found to be quite prone to easy scratching.
We have some misgivings about the speakers too, but we're happy to say they're among the best we've ever heard on a slate. Where so many other tablet makers relegate the speakers on the back or, at best, the sides facing outward, here they're exactly where they should be: to the left and right of the display and pointing front and center. Their sound is reasonably warm, too, packing a lot of punch for a tablet. But, the most important part of that sentence is "for a tablet." Sound is adequate at best, and you'll want to augment more serious viewing experiences with a set of headphones or external speakers.

Performance and battery life


DNP Nexus 10 review

Again we're talking about a dual-core 1.7GHz A15 processor paired with 2GB of RAM and a Mali T604 GPU. The quantity of RAM is certainly healthy but, when compared to the quad-core 1.7GHz Transformer Pad Infinity TF700 or with Samsung's recent Galaxy Note 10.1, on paper it sounds like no contest. As they say in motorsports, that's why they run the races, and in practice the Nexus 10 feels snappy and responsive. Apps load quickly and are quite responsive and web pages too pop into existence about as quickly as your data connection can suck them down.

Nexus 10 ($399) ASUS Transformer Pad Infinity TF700 ($499) ASUS Transformer Prime ($499) Samsung GalaxyNote10.1
Quadrant 4,551 4,685 4,137 5,695
Vellamo 1,605 1,475 1,418 2,395
AnTuTu 8,731 12,027 10,269 11,962
SunSpider 0.9.1 (ms) 1,371 2,012 1,861 1,193
GLBenchmark 2.5 Egypt Offscreen (fps) 33 n/a (test run with 2.1) n/a n/a
CF-Bench 9,772 7,874 11,861 13,157
SunSpider: lower scores are better 

Even in 3D gaming the Nexus 10 will hold its own, a result backed by an average GLBenchmark 2.5 score of 33. Unfortunately, we've not run the TF700 through the latest version of GLBenchmark, so we're unable to directly compare, but others online report scores of roughly 15fps from the ASUS tablet. So, if you're looking to do a lot of intense 3D gaming, this could be a much better partner.

Tablet Battery Life
Nexus 10 7:26
Apple iPad mini 12:43 (WiFi)
Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.7 12:01
Apple iPad (late 2012) 11:08 (WiFi)
Apple iPad 2 10:26
ASUS Eee Pad Transformer Prime 10:17
Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 9:55
Apple iPad (2012) 9:52 (HSPA) /
9:37 (LTE)
Google Nexus 7 9:49
Microsoft Surface for Windows RT 9:36
Apple iPad 9:33
ASUS Transformer Prime Infinity TF700 9:25
Pantech Element 9:00
Motorola Xoom 2 8:57
HP TouchPad 8:33
Lenovo IdeaPad K1 8:20
Motorola Xoom 8:20
T-Mobile G-Slate 8:18
Acer Iconia Tab A200 8:16
Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.0 Plus 8:09
Galaxy Note 10.1 8:00
Lenovo ThinkPad Tablet 8:00
Archos 101 7:20
Archos 80 G9 7:06
RIM BlackBerry PlayBook 7:01

The TF700 also managed a higher battery life, nine hours and 25 minutes compared to a relatively paltry 7:26 here. That's on our standard run-down test in which we loop a video on the tablet endlessly while screen brightness is fixed. We figure the blame for this performance must lie largely in the hands of that display, as even the Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 did notably better, at 8:56.

Camera


DNP Nexus 10 review

Samsung certainly knows how to make a good imaging sensor -- the Galaxy S II still shines -- so we were cautiously optimistic coming in here despite knowing that the company's tablets have historically had miserable shooters. This one, we're sorry to say, follows in their footsteps. The 5-megapixel camera on the back failed in virtually every case to take a compelling shot. Complex images were too soft and simpler images were often rendered with curious color temperatures that had little to do with reality.

That unfortunately dynamic color handling continues to the video shooting. The tablet is capable of recording at 1080p but, as you can see in the sample video, it's over-active when it comes to choosing a color temperature, constantly cycling from cool to warm. Similarly, the camera exhibits some distracting focus hunting during filming.
Granted, we find photographing or filming anything on any tablet a chore, regardless of sensor quality, so the lack of a good quality shooter here isn't too much of a detraction. But, we figure if you're going to bother putting a camera sensor on a tablet, you might as well throw in a good one.

Software


Nexus 10 review

It's Android 4.2 here, a tenth higher than before but still called Jelly Bean. As such don't expect any life-altering improvements, but there are some nice additions.

Keyboard

There's a new keyboard here, but you probably wouldn't notice it if you didn't know better. You can now swipe your way from one letter to the next to spell out words quickly. The experience isn't as polished or powerful as the third-party alternative, Swype, but it's a nice addition for those keen to keep the stock keyboard.
Additionally, there's a far more comprehensive predictive text mode here that does a better job of figuring out what you're going to say before you've had a chance to tap or swipe it in. It's no SwiftKey, but it makes for a nice addition.

Camera


DNP Nexus 10 review

The camera has received a lot of attention, including a fancy new UI that is very minimalist. The biggest new addition here, though, is a 360 degree photo capture mode called Photo Sphere. An incredibly slick interface guides you through capturing enough pictures to effectively surround yourself, generating floating blue dots that you must hit like targets while the software stitches all the pictures together. That's when everything falls apart.
The resulting spherical images look awful. We took many and not a single one was created that didn't have glaring seams. Even if they were blended perfectly, it'd still be easy to pick out the individual photos. The camera is constantly adjusting exposure for each individual picture, so when they're all blended together some shots are bright, some are murky -- and some are simply a blurry mess. It's a very cool idea that, sadly, is poorly done here, but we're not sure whether to blame the camera or the implementation at this point.
The returning side-to-side panorama mode is a bit better, operating much like Apple's in that you just sweep the tablet from left to right and it does the rest for you. The stitching here is far better than in the Photo Sphere mode, about perfect as far as we can tell, but there's still that same exposure issue, with darker sections of the surroundings actually appearing brighter than those areas that should be light.

Miracast

Miracast is the Wi-Fi Alliance's standard for wireless streaming of video, and its addition to Jelly Bean made us very excited -- Android finally has a response to AirPlay. Imagine our disappointment, then, upon learning that Miracast isn't supported in the Nexus 10, at least not yet. It is there in the Nexus 4, a perplexing state of affairs that Google wasn't able to give us much clarity on, but it does appear that this is not a hardware limitation, since all the communication takes place over WiFi. If Miracast isn't going to be software-enabled in every Android 4.2 device then we're struggling to see how it's actually part of the OS, and we're definitely feeling let down about its potential to improve the platform as a whole.

Other tweaks

There's a new quick settings menu that appears should you drag down from the upper-right side of the bezel. It gives you access to the brightness and things like toggling WiFi, Bluetooth or Airplane Mode. There's also a shortcut to the rest of the settings. If you want the notification bar, you swipe down from the left side of the bezel. It's intuitive enough once you've done it a few times, but as there's no visual indicator at the top of the screen to help the newbies.
Jelly Bean 4.2 also brings support for multiple users -- but that wasn't enabled yet. We're told it's coming on November 13th. In theory it could be a boon for corporate adoption of Android, and it could also make letting your kids use your tablet an awful lot safer. ("Who deleted all my email!") But, we're sadly unable to tell you just how useful that is at this moment.

The competition


DNP Nexus 10 review

At under $400, the Nexus 10 is a compelling package, but despite that display it can't quite muster best-in-class performances across the charts. In fact, other than a relative lack of resolution (1,920 x 1,200 vs. this guy's 2,560 x 1,600) the Transformer Pad Infinity TF700 is, we think, an overall better package. It's thinner, lighter, faster, has a much better camera, offers better battery life (particularly if you opt for the keyboard dock) and, frankly, we'd take the brightness and contrast of that 600 nit, Super IPS+ panel over this one with its extra pixels.
What does ASUS's offering lack? Well, Android 4.2 for one thing, but as we've shown above you're just an aftermarket keyboard app away from getting the best that has to offer right now. And, the Nexus 10 does have a lower starting price of $399 for a 16GB model. The cheapest we were able to find the TF700 currently is $477 -- but that's for 32GB, so it's actually $20 cheaper than the 32GB Nexus 10. Plus, the TF700 offers expandable storage.
There's also the Galaxy Tab 2 10.1, which right now is $349 for 16GB (again, user-expandable), so you're saving a little money, but it's bigger, heavier, has a 1,200 x 800 display, offers worse performance and has a similarly poor camera. It does, though, manage better battery life.
And, of course, if you're thinking about crossing the aisle to the iOS side, there is the fourth-gen iPad. That tablet's 2,048 x 1,536 display is lacking a fair few pixels in both dimensions but it more than makes up for it in other regards (namely contrast and saturation), its battery life is far better (over 11 hours on our test) and it of course offers up access to the zillions of tablet-optimized apps in the App Store -- for a starting price of $100 more.
Wrap-up

DNP Nexus 10 review

The Nexus 7 impressed us on nearly every front. What few flaws there were we more than forgave thanks to its bargain-basement price. At $400 to $500, the Nexus 10 is actually on par with many other 10-inch Android competitors -- even a little more expensive than some -- and, with average performance in most areas and sub-par battery life, it's relying on that incredibly high resolution and fresh Android build to set it apart. Sadly, neither is enough to distance this tablet from the competition.

The resolution is indeed quite nice but in many ways, the Super IPS+ panel on the ASUS Transformer Pad Infinity TF700 is even nicer, and other than that new keyboard there's nothing much in Android 4.2 to get excited about right now. Of course, the true beauty of the Nexus line is that when 4.3 rolls around this slate will be the first to get it, and that is certainly worth something. But is it worth enough to make up for this tablet's other shortcomings?


Apple launches new 27-inch Thunderbolt Display


Apple has launched the world’s first Thunderbolt display. This new display is mostly identical to the old 27-inch LED Cinema Display but has a couple of new additions. 

 

The first one is the most obvious. The new Thunderbolt Display uses a Thunderbolt connector instead of a Mini DisplayPort. The Thunderbolt connectivity takes care of the display, sound as well as data transfer. Due to this the new Thunderbolt Display does not have a separate USB cable unlike the old LED Cinema Display.

 

The new display also has a FireWire 800 port in addition to the three USB 2.0 ports, as well as another Thunderbolt port so you can daisy chain multiple devices. There is even a Gigabit Ethernet port on the back. Because of all these connectivity options, you can connect everything to the display itself and simply connect the Thunderbolt cable to your MacBook, so when you have to leave and take the MacBook with you all you have to do is unplug a single cable and you are good to go. 


The rest of it is identical to the older Cinema Display. It still has the same glossy 27-inch 2560 x 1440 LED backlit display. There is a FaceTime camera on top which now supports HD recording and built-in 49 watts 2.1 speaker set. The Thunderbolt Display comes with the built-in adjustable stand or you can opt for a wall-mount. 

The Thunderbolt Display costs the same as the LED Cinema Display, which is $999. However, this new model only works with Macs that support the Thunderbolt port. If you have an older Mac, you should consider investing in the older LED Cinema Display instead, which is still on sale. 


Lenovo continues CES invasion with IdeaCentre B-series all-in-ones and refreshed desktops

By:
 
If you thought Lenovo was going to stop its announcements at ultrabooks and netbooks, you obviously don’t know the company very well. The Chinese announcement marathon continued with a bunch of solid desktop computers and refreshed all-in-ones.

 

More specifically, the IdeaCentre B-series got a refresh in the form of the B540 and B340 powerful all-in-ones, while the Lenovo desktop family got new members from the IdeaCentre K and H series.

IdeaCentre B540 and B340

Let’s start with the IdeaCentre B540 and B340 all-in-ones. The B540 will come with a 23-inch full HD display out of the box, while the lower-end B340 sports a 21.5-inch one.Lenovo says the new B-series have an improved multi-touch technology and can be ordered with 3D screens if you want. 


Lenovo IdeaCentre B540 and B340

The company doesn’t get too specific on the processor part, but both machines will have Intel Core CPUs of some kind, up to 8GB of DDR3 RAM, 2TB SATA III hard drives and up to 1GB-packing NVIDIA GeForce 615M graphics card.
Both AIOs can be purchased with the optional OnKey TV4, which is Lenovo’s own way of switching between the PC and TV modes of the computer. There’s also a picture-in-picture mode and the ability to watch just TV without powering the PC on. Expect the refreshed B-series in June with a starting price of $699.

IdeaCentre K430 and Lenovo H520s

Moving on to the tower desktops we come upon the IdeaCentre K430, which is a real treat if you are loaded enough to spec it to the max. It’s powered by Intel Core i7 CPUs, up to 32GB of DDR3 SDRAM, dual-graphics support by either NVIDIA or AMD, and up to 4TB of HDD configured in RAID 0. 


Lenovo IdeaCentre K430 and H520s


The H520s, unlike its more powerful brother, chooses to provide better value for money instead of ultimate performance. It comes with an Intel Core family CPU, 2GB AMD Radeon HD7570 or a 2GB NVIDIA GeForce GPU and 8GB of DDR3 SDRAM. The maximum storage available is 2TB.
The IdeaCentre K430 will be available in May with a starting price tag of $599, while the H520s will pop up in June for $499.

Source

Dell announces Alienware X51, the smallest Alienware gaming desktop ever


The words ‘affordable’ and ‘Alienware’ don’t usually go together but with the new Alienware X51, Dell intends to change that. It is the smallest Alienware desktop gaming system so far and also the cheapest. But despite the starting price of ‘just’ $699, the new Alienware X51 packs in decent hardware. 

 

For starters you get a 3.3GHz Core i3-2120 processor as standard with the option to upgrade to a Core i5 or i7. You also get a full-size Nvidia GeForce GT545 with 1GB GDDR5 memory with an option to choose the GT555. Then there is 4GB of RAM (option to go for 8GB), 1TB, 7,200-rpm hard drive, slot-loading DVD drive (optional Blu-ray drive), integrated Wi-Fi, 7.1 channel HD audio, six USB 2.0 ports, two USB 3.0 ports, Ethernet and HDMI 1.4. You get a standard 240 watt power supply or an optional 330 watt power supply. 

 

On the software side, you get Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit and a host of Alienware software, from the Alienware Command Center that gives you access to all the functions, including the AlienFX lighting effects on the side and AlienFusion power management system. AlienAdrenaline lets you create unique game profiles for launching various customizable events. 

With a starting price of $669, Dell is probably hoping to lure some console gamers over to the PC gaming side. For that price, the Alienware X51 seems like a decent budget gaming system if you’re not the kind of person who likes to build his own system. Don’t forget to factor in the cost of a decent monitor and keyboard/mouse if you are considering buying one. 

Source